WIL Compensation Profiles · Research Brief · September 2026

Construction Management and Engineering Compensation: San Francisco

A public-source wage profile of the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA, May 2025

What construction managers, cost estimators, construction supervisors, and civil engineers earn in the San Francisco metro area — BLS OEWS percentiles benchmarked against California and national levels, with QCEW construction-industry wage context.

Overview

This profile reports what four core construction management and engineering occupations are paid in the San Francisco metropolitan area, using the most recent federal occupational wage statistics. A geographic note first: BLS publishes occupational wages at the metropolitan-statistical-area level, so "San Francisco" here means the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA — San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, and San Mateo counties — not any single city government's boundaries. All figures are annual wages in US dollars from the OEWS May 2025 reference period. The profile is produced under the Lab's public-source compensation benchmarking method (WIL-CBM-1.0): it is a public-data profile, not a peer survey, and it describes pay positioning only — it makes no claim about labor availability or hiring conditions.

Table 1. Annual wage distribution, San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA — OEWS May 2025
Occupation (SOC)10th pctileMedianMean90th pctileEmployment
Construction Managers (11-9021)$100,910$166,030$164,760$225,1205,160
Civil Engineers (17-2051)$90,860$130,160$136,350$202,73010,990
First-Line Supervisors, Construction Trades (47-1011)$73,860$120,810$119,190$166,3309,810
Cost Estimators (13-1051)$58,910$101,630$109,520$167,7803,300

Annual wages, US dollars. Employment is OEWS-estimated occupational employment in the MSA. — Sources: BLS

San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA · OEWS May 2025
Median annual wage by occupation
US dollars, thousands. Public-source federal statistics — pay positioning, not an availability measure.
Median annual wage by occupationBar chart: Construction Managers 166; Civil Engineers 130.2; Constr. Supervisors 120.8; Cost Estimators 101.6, on a 0–180 scale.04590135180Construction Managers166Civil Engineers130.2Constr. Supervisors120.8Cost Estimators101.6

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025 — San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA; California; United States · Methodology WIL-CBM-1.0 · Public-source federal statistics. Annual wages in US dollars; OEWS estimates are modeled from employer surveys and carry published relative standard errors.

Table 2. Median annual wage — San Francisco MSA vs. California and the United States, OEWS May 2025
OccupationSan Francisco MSACaliforniaUnited Statesvs. USvs. CA
Construction Managers$166,030$133,160$114,990+44.4%+24.7%
Civil Engineers$130,160$122,500$100,840+29.1%+6.3%
First-Line Supervisors$120,810$97,680$79,920+51.2%+23.7%
Cost Estimators$101,630$85,460$78,740+29.1%+18.9%

Percentages computed from OEWS medians as shown; positive = metro median above the benchmark. — Sources: BLS

What the figures show

San Francisco is the highest-paying metro in this series for three of the four occupations: construction managers ($166,030, +24.7% above the California median and +44.4% above the national), first-line supervisors ($120,810, +23.7% vs. state), and cost estimators ($101,630, +18.9% vs. state). Civil engineers ($130,160) sit essentially level with San Jose and Sacramento at the top of the state's civil-engineering pay band. Even the 10th-percentile figures here exceed several metros' medians — a compressed-at-the-top distribution consistent with the region's cost structure. These are observed pay comparisons only; nothing here measures how hard these roles are to fill.

Table 3. Industry context — California private construction (NAICS 23), QCEW quarterly
QuarterAvg weekly wageEmploymentEstablishments
2024 Q3$1,703927,72594,804
2024 Q4$1,872912,13895,962
2025 Q1$1,715876,22497,859
2025 Q2$1,730901,19598,384
2025 Q3$1,767905,89899,388

Statewide, all occupations within private NAICS 23 — broader than the four profiled occupations. Year over year (Q3 2024 → Q3 2025): average weekly wage +3.8%; employment −2.4%; establishments +4.8%. Quarterly wage figures are not seasonally adjusted (Q4 typically carries year-end pay). — Sources: BLS

Method and limitations

Prepared under WIL-CBM-1.0 (Public-Source Compensation Benchmarking: A Method Note, WIL-RB-2026.3-COMP-METHOD). Wage figures are BLS OEWS May 2025 estimates for the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA, California, and the United States, read from the Lab's governed warehouse (BLS_OEWS ingest, June 2026); industry context is BLS QCEW, private ownership, NAICS 23, through Q3 2025 (BLS_QCEW ingest, June 2026). Limitations: this is a public-data profile, not a peer survey — no employer-specific comparators were collected, so it does not substitute for a WIL-CBM-1.0 peer study where employer-level matching is required. Coverage is four occupations at the MSA level; city- or employer-level variation within the MSA is not observable in OEWS. OEWS wages are modeled estimates with published relative standard errors (roughly 1–3 percent for these cells); QCEW quarterly wages are not seasonally adjusted. No cell used here was suppressed; any suppressed cell would be shown as missing, never zero. This profile asserts pay positioning only — not workforce availability, not hiring conditions.

State workforce context — California

A live public-signal read for California from the Lab's standing trackers — banded and directional, refreshed independently of this brief.

Workforce exposure
Moderate
Exposure movement
easing
Wage position
material premium over national medians
Federal-award momentum
High · easing

Source: Workforce Exposure Index and federal-award momentum — public_reports (banded). Directional, banded read — not a forecast. Methodology v2 · last updated 2026-05-26. See Live metrics for the full charts.

Suggested citationAlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab. (2026). Construction Management and Engineering Compensation: San Francisco: A public-source wage profile of the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA, May 2025 (Publication No. WIL-RB-2026.3-COMP-SF, Version 1.0). WIL Compensation Profiles.

Version 1.0 · Published 2026-09-07 · Permanent ID WIL-RB-2026.3-COMP-SF. This record is versioned; the URL is permanent and stable for citation.

Export citation (BibTeX · RIS)
BibTeX
@techreport{WILRB20263COMPSF,
  title       = {Construction Management and Engineering Compensation: San Francisco: A public-source wage profile of the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA, May 2025},
  author      = {AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab},
  institution = {AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab},
  type        = {WIL Compensation Profiles},
  number      = {WIL-RB-2026.3-COMP-SF},
  year        = {2026},
  note        = {Version 1.0; methodology WIL-CBM-1.0},
  url         = {https://wilinstitute.org/library/p/compensation-profile-construction-management-san-francisco},
}
RIS
TY  - RPRT
AU  - AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab
TI  - Construction Management and Engineering Compensation: San Francisco: A public-source wage profile of the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA, May 2025
PY  - 2026
PB  - AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab
M1  - WIL-RB-2026.3-COMP-SF
ET  - Version 1.0
UR  - https://wilinstitute.org/library/p/compensation-profile-construction-management-san-francisco
AB  - A public-source compensation profile of four construction management and engineering occupations in the San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley, CA MSA, using BLS OEWS May 2025 wage percentiles benchmarked against California and national levels, with BLS QCEW private construction (NAICS 23) industry context. The highest-paying metro in the series for three of the four occupations. Prepared under methodology WIL-CBM-1.0; this is a public-data profile, not a peer survey.
ER  -